Tournament presence · pick + ban
14.3%#55 of 173 champions
Pick
7.1%picked in 1,971 of 27,748 games
Ban
7.2%1,616 bans over 22,550 games, against 2.8% in soloQ
Win rate as Top52.7% between 50.6% and 54.8% over 1,544 gamesSoloQ 51.8%: no clear gap
Median length29 minsoloQ 27.1 min

Amateur: 27,970 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 65% · EUW 25% · NA 10%. SoloQ Master+: 951,671 games on the same patches. An amateur figure in gold clearly differs from soloQ.

At a glance

Four answers, each one opens its chapter.
01 — What changes in tournaments

What changes in tournaments?

3 clear gaps between soloQ and amateur tournaments as Top.

  • DraftBanned more often in amateur play
    Amateur
    7.3%
    SoloQ
    2.8%
    7.3% ban rate in amateur play over 14,779 games, against 2.8% in soloQ over 419,060 games.
  • LengthLonger games in amateur play
    Amateur
    29 min
    SoloQ
    27.1 min
    Median of 29 min in amateur play, against 27.1 min in soloQ.
  • SpellsFlash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite
    Amateur
    47%
    SoloQ
    57%
    Played in 47% of amateur games; soloQ sticks to Flash + Ignite (57%).
02 — How to play it

How to play it?

Grasp of the Undying, then Trinity Force, Ravenous Hydra, and Death's Dance: the most played build in soloQ.

SoloQ build, amateur differences under each block
RunesGrasp of the Undying81% · 44,971
Same in amateur play
SpellsFlash + Ignite57% · 31,517
≠ Amateur: Flash + Teleport instead of Flash + Ignite. 47% · 1,731 games
SkillsQnot collected in soloQ
Amateur: 100% · 293 games
Core (3 legendaries)44% · 8,849
44%of soloQ games
  1. Trinity Force
  2. Ravenous Hydra
  3. Death's Dance
Same in amateur play

Not collected in soloQ: starting items, 4th item, and skill order.

03 — In a comp

What does it bring to a comp?

Team damage first: more damage than 88% of top laners.

  1. Team damagetop12%25% · top laners: 20%
  2. Takes its kills in duelstop25%31% · top laners: 28%

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other top laners

What marks it

  • Duelist
  • Damage
  • Split-push

Like other top laners

  • Damage in lane
  • Damage in late game
  • Gold at 15 min
  • Gold at 20 min
  • Absorbs damage
  • Plays teamfights
  • Crowd control (CC)

What it is not

  • No poke

Damage / min by phase · at equal gold

Rank 65 in lane, 89 in mid game and 60 in late game, out of 100 top laners.

629+30 vs 599
970+102 vs 868
1,110+30 vs 1,079
Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30
Camilletop laners

Gold vs. direct opponent

At 20 min, ahead of 71% of top laners against the direct opponent.

top laners

Where it stands among top laners · every measure

0 ← less · median · more → 100
  • Damage in lane · rank 65 of 100 among top laners629 · median 599
  • Damage in mid game · rank 89 of 100 among top laners970 · median 868
  • Damage in late game · rank 60 of 100 among top laners1,110 · median 1,079
  • Gold at 15 min · rank 53 of 100 among top laners+121 · median +119
  • Gold at 20 min · rank 71 of 100 among top laners+353 · median +100
  • Absorbs damage · rank 67 of 100 among top laners1,129 · median 970
  • Plays teamfights · rank 27 of 100 among top laners51% · median 53%
  • Takes its kills in duels · rank 75 of 100 among top laners31% · median 28%
  • Lets allies carry kills · rank 24 of 100 among top lanersrank 24 of 100
  • Crowd control (CC) · rank 51 of 100 among top laners0.8 · median 0.8
  • Team damage · rank 88 of 100 among top laners25% · median 20%
04 — With / against

With whom, against whom?

Better than expected against Bard in amateur play: +16.0 pts over 44 games, range above zero.

in

Best results

Ranked by the gap to expected in amateur play, at the lower bound of its interval, at most 5 per role. The other source is a reference.

Against

Topgap to expected
Gragas66.7% · expected 55.0% · 36 g+11.7 ptSoloQ -0.4
Zaahen58.1% · expected 50.1% · 43 g+8.1 ptSoloQ +0.3
Shen62.8% · expected 55.2% · 43 g+7.6 ptSoloQ -2.7
Ornn53.6% · expected 52.2% · 151 g+1.4 ptSoloQ +0.9
Ambessa54.2% · expected 52.2% · 107 g+2.0 ptSoloQ +0.9
Junglegap to expected
Lillia63.0% · expected 49.2% · 46 g+13.8 ptSoloQ -0.9
Jarvan IV62.0% · expected 54.2% · 121 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -1.9
Cho'Gath60.0% · expected 51.5% · 40 g+8.5 ptSoloQ -1.2
Lee Sin55.8% · expected 53.1% · 120 g+2.8 ptSoloQ -0.7
Wukong52.4% · expected 50.3% · 143 g+2.2 ptSoloQ -0.7
Midgap to expected
Ahri57.4% · expected 50.7% · 122 g+6.7 ptSoloQ +1.1
Orianna59.4% · expected 54.9% · 96 g+4.4 ptSoloQ +1.8
Galio62.5% · expected 53.7% · 32 g+8.8 ptSoloQ -1.2
Sylas57.1% · expected 52.8% · 63 g+4.3 ptSoloQ +0.6
LeBlanc56.9% · expected 52.2% · 51 g+4.6 ptSoloQ +1.5
ADCgap to expected
Caitlyn56.5% · expected 50.8% · 115 g+5.8 ptSoloQ +1.1
Ashe57.5% · expected 51.4% · 80 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -0.7
Aphelios63.5% · expected 56.4% · 63 g+7.0 ptSoloQ -0.1
Jinx52.4% · expected 50.9% · 103 g+1.5 ptSoloQ -0.5
Zeri53.1% · expected 49.8% · 64 g+3.3 ptSoloQ +1.8
Supportgap to expected
Bard65.9% · expected 49.9% · 44 g+16.0 ptSoloQ -0.8
Karma61.6% · expected 55.3% · 86 g+6.4 ptSoloQ +0.1
Neeko60.0% · expected 50.9% · 35 g+9.1 ptSoloQ -0.7
Nautilus53.8% · expected 52.5% · 130 g+1.3 ptSoloQ -2.1
Thresh52.9% · expected 51.4% · 85 g+1.6 ptSoloQ -1.7

With

Junglegap to expected
Wukong62.9% · expected 55.1% · 151 g+7.8 ptSoloQ -0.5
Nocturne54.1% · expected 50.4% · 85 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +0.6
Jarvan IV53.2% · expected 51.2% · 126 g+1.9 ptSoloQ -1.9
Lee Sin54.5% · expected 52.4% · 112 g+2.1 ptSoloQ -0.4
Midgap to expected
Aurora67.3% · expected 51.8% · 55 g+15.4 ptSoloQ +0.5
Orianna56.6% · expected 50.5% · 99 g+6.1 ptSoloQ -0.1
Sylas60.0% · expected 52.6% · 70 g+7.4 ptSoloQ +2.6
Viktor56.5% · expected 53.2% · 124 g+3.2 ptSoloQ +2.4
Locke59.2% · expected 52.2% · 49 g+6.9 ptSoloQ -1.8
ADCgap to expected
Ziggs61.8% · expected 48.3% · 34 g+13.5 ptSoloQ +1.1
Miss Fortune61.8% · expected 52.0% · 55 g+9.8 ptSoloQ -2.4
Ashe61.4% · expected 54.1% · 88 g+7.3 ptSoloQ +0.1
Yunara58.0% · expected 54.8% · 169 g+3.1 ptSoloQ -0.3
Kai'Sa55.9% · expected 52.2% · 111 g+3.6 ptSoloQ -1.5
Supportgap to expected
Bard71.1% · expected 55.5% · 38 g+15.5 ptSoloQ +0.5
Seraphine60.2% · expected 53.7% · 98 g+6.5 ptSoloQ +0.6
Lulu53.9% · expected 50.2% · 152 g+3.7 ptSoloQ +0.2
Thresh60.6% · expected 54.1% · 71 g+6.5 ptSoloQ -0.4
Milio56.4% · expected 50.8% · 78 g+5.7 ptSoloQ +1.0

Matchups and allies

One group per role of the other champion, five cards first. The bar is the win rate range, the tick marks 50%; the colour of the gap gives our reading, it sorts nothing.

Sort by
Top22 champions
  • Ornn151 games
    53.6%gap +1.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.8% · 1,398 g
  • Ambessa107 games
    54.2%gap +2.0 ptsSoloQ: 54.2% · 1,997 g
  • Renekton82 games
    50.0%gap -1.2 ptsSoloQ: 51.3% · 2,348 g
  • K'Sante80 games
    52.5%gap -2.4 ptsSoloQ: 55.6% · 1,285 g
  • Olaf74 games
    43.2%gap -6.4 ptsSoloQ: 51.1% · 1,523 g
Jungle22 champions
  • Wukong143 games
    52.4%gap +2.2 ptsSoloQ: 50.2% · 1,832 g
  • Jarvan IV121 games
    62.0%gap +7.8 ptsSoloQ: 50.9% · 2,065 g
  • Lee Sin120 games
    55.8%gap +2.8 ptsSoloQ: 51.4% · 3,870 g
  • Vi112 games
    49.1%gap -3.3 ptsSoloQ: 52.5% · 1,159 g
  • Xin Zhao64 games
    46.9%gap -6.0 ptsSoloQ: 50.9% · 790 g
Mid20 champions
  • Ahri122 games
    57.4%gap +6.7 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 2,607 g
  • Syndra106 games
    47.2%gap -4.8 ptsSoloQ: 53.4% · 2,552 g
  • Viktor103 games
    50.5%gap -1.7 ptsSoloQ: 52.0% · 2,606 g
  • Orianna96 games
    59.4%gap +4.4 ptsSoloQ: 55.3% · 1,108 g
  • Hwei65 games
    44.6%gap -6.8 ptsSoloQ: 51.9% · 1,103 g
ADC17 champions
  • Yunara152 games
    48.7%gap -1.9 ptsSoloQ: 50.7% · 4,198 g
  • Kai'Sa128 games
    52.3%gap -0.9 ptsSoloQ: 51.8% · 4,505 g
  • Ezreal117 games
    54.7%gap -1.3 ptsSoloQ: 55.8% · 3,195 g
  • Caitlyn115 games
    56.5%gap +5.8 ptsSoloQ: 54.1% · 2,980 g
  • Jinx103 games
    52.4%gap +1.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.8% · 3,522 g
Support18 champions
  • Lulu137 games
    51.1%gap -4.1 ptsSoloQ: 51.4% · 3,848 g
  • Nautilus130 games
    53.8%gap +1.3 ptsSoloQ: 50.5% · 3,280 g
  • Braum116 games
    48.3%gap -2.5 ptsSoloQ: 49.9% · 1,758 g
  • Leona98 games
    54.1%gap +0.3 ptsSoloQ: 51.6% · 2,246 g
  • Milio93 games
    55.9%gap +1.2 ptsSoloQ: 53.2% · 1,461 g
05 — In draft

Ban it or pick it?

Taken at any point of the series.

Pick rate as Top

Amateur tournaments, compared with soloQ
  • SoloQ Master+2.8%53,073 picks of 1,903,323ban 2.8% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Amateur tournaments2.8%1,082 picks of 38,304ban 7.3% · patches 16.19 to 16.21
  • Pro5.2%116 picks of 2,238bans not published · patches 16.17 to 16.20

Presence by patch

16.4% on 16.21
16.1216.21
Pick + ban, all regions, one point per patch; a patch without a measure leaves a gap.

Within the series

Fearless series only · as Top
  • 5.4%G1380 games of 7,043
  • 6.1%G2432 games of 7,044
  • 6.5%G3+183 games of 2,802
Once picked, the series moves on toIn G2, over 380 series where it is played in G1 then replaced in the same role. Published from 30 series.
Amateur: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes; soloQ: Master+, same patches. An amateur figure in gold and each card of “What changes” flag a gap that the volumes of both sources settle. Build: shares only, no win rate, which mostly follows game length. Gap to expected (lolalytics' Delta 2): the pair's win rate minus the one the two champions' own strength predicts, their win rate in their role in the same source; it is coloured when its 90% interval excludes 0, teal favourable, orange unfavourable. Under 30 games: games only.